Which of the following is NOT a possible reason for multiple CPMs in CyberArk?

In the context of CyberArk, multiple Central Policy Managers (CPMs) can be implemented for various practical reasons related to network architecture and system performance, with the goal of ensuring efficient management of privileged accounts and credentials across an organization. One possible reason for deploying multiple CPMs can be associated with isolated network segments. This architectural decision is made to address the needs of various segments that require separate management due to security, compliance, or operational reasons.

Similarly, WAN link latency can also influence the decision to deploy multiple CPMs. High latency in wide area networks can lead to performance issues when trying to communicate with a centralized CPM. By distributing CPMs closer to where they are needed, organizations can mitigate performance drawbacks associated with long-distance data transmission.

Scalability is another valid reason, as organizations grow and require increased capacity to manage more accounts and operations efficiently. Adding more CPMs helps to distribute the load and maintain responsiveness.

Adverse weather conditions, however, do not represent a technical or operational reason for the implementation of multiple CPMs. While weather can impact physical infrastructure and connectivity in general, it is not a strategic reason impacting the design and functionality of the CyberArk environment. Therefore, it stands apart from the technological considerations driving the deployment of multiple CPMs